Re: Mac OS X and netatalk...


Subject: Re: Mac OS X and netatalk...
From: Jason Quigley (jasonq@mac.com)
Date: Tue Mar 27 2001 - 15:31:31 EST


Everybody is talking about Classic here. Granted, that's faster, but
things like re-sizing windows and using the finder are just as slow,
even if they do look prettier.

Cheers,
Jason.

On Tuesday, March 27, 2001, at 10:13 pm, Chad Cunningham wrote:

>
> I agree, I've got the final release on an iBook G3 300 and it works
> great.
> The slowness associated with PB is gone, doesn't get hung up switching
> active windows, etc. Apps are still a bit slow to launch, but waking up
> from sleep is much much faster. Speed on classic apps is excellent, much
> much better than PB.
>
> Really, I think it will run fine on any G3 with sufficient ram (at least
> 128 if you want to use classic).
>



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b28 : Sun Oct 14 2001 - 03:04:35 EDT